[Compcomm] The Next Step

[Stephen Moore]

hehehe, you're all like little children

to start with, let's get a list of

a) what needs to be done for there to be no functionality loss after the
merge
b) what has been done
c) what needs to be done
d) list of derogitory remarks that haven't been used and then we make a rule
not to repeat a derogitory remark more than once..
e) ways of chilling out, as everyone here seems to be short of ideas how to
do this

(a, b and c are being serious)

On 4/17/07, Mike Dransfield <mike at blueroot.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Kristian Lyngstøl wrote:
> > I figured I offer my wisdom:
> >
> > BLA  BLA BLA BLA BLA (insult) (retort) (beryl code sucks) (no you
> > suck!) BLA BLA BLA ( I want the background to be blue!) (I want it to
> > be yellow) (You suck!)  (Troll) (STUPIDHEAD) BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA
> > (I want the C in the name to be capital!) (I want ot to be cursive!)
> > (You're obviously an idiot because that just won't work!) (YOU SUCK!)
> > BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA
> >
> > So what else is new?
> >
>
> No obvious spelling errors?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CompComm mailing list
> CompComm at Rock3d.org
> http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.RiverGorgeSolutions.net/pipermail/compcomm/attachments/20070417/9c2e2a4e/attachment-0002.htm>