[Compcomm] A possible forum merge proposal

[jug]

On 4/26/07, RYX <ryx at ryxperience.com> wrote:

> > > Ultimately I think we need a democracy.
> Hmm - not sure about that. Do you know of any project where democracy
> doesn't lead to stagnation? We need a better organization based on
> everyone's real capabilities, not based on everyone's ability to throw
> out nice words and plans. If people with knowledge and experience decide
> about things, then we have a result like compiz - the other way round
> ends up with beryl. What would you prefer?

Bad choices. Don't bring up that compiz vs beryl discussion again. ;)
Other than that I agree with you, it's crucial that the people making
decisions have the qualifications to do so. (I know I don't - I just point
out some of the flaws that could be improved)

> > I know this will not always be perfect. People disagree with decisions
> and
> > > maybe wrong decisions will be made, but there will be progress. And
> that is
> > > better than endless discussions without any progress and therefor with
> > > people getting bored, frustrated and then leave the project.
> If FUD-spreading, half-hearted and impatient people leave the project I
> can really see nothing negative in that. If that is needed to get
> together a bunch of people who accept each other and respect each
> other's work - then yes, let's get rid of those bored and frustrated
> pussies.

I think this merge was rushed from the beginning, and now there are users
(yes, me included) waiting for you to deliver. But I guess you are right,
for the time being you can live without impatient people. Still, this does
not mean that slowing down is acceptable.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.RiverGorgeSolutions.net/pipermail/compcomm/attachments/20070426/dae40f43/attachment-0002.htm>