[Compcomm] So what's going on code-wise? Or what we're working on.

[Robert Carr]

Be constructive or go away.

On 4/27/07, RYX <ryx at ryxperience.com> wrote:
> Emerald is not very innovate or extensible so why do you waste your time
> with re-implementing that bad approach?
>
> Why don't you instead help David to finish his TODO-list for the
> decorator(s) and implement a proper plugin-interface for it? It is the
> waaay better solution for the decorator-problem and would allow much
> more cool stuff instead of much more decorator-confusion.
>
> Everybody could benefit from that and I am sure David would appreciate
> any help on gwd ...
>
> Am Freitag, den 27.04.2007, 19:12 +0200 schrieb Patrick "Marex" Niklaus:
> > >
> > > I hope other developers can post about what they are working on here as well.
> > >
> >
> > I'm currently working on Emerald-2. Basically I'm going to rebase
> > Emerald on the current Gtk-Window-Decorator again, which means proper
> > usage of libdecoration etc. The settings backend of emerald (gkeyfile
> > powered) is already rewritten (even if not fully bug free) and will be
> > used on the rebased version.
> >
> > Besides that I'm trying to be a helping hand when it comes to debugging/testing.
> >
> > However, on my TODO list is also some work at group plugin, so thats
> > probably what I'm going to do after finishing emerald-2.
> > _______________________________________________
> > CompComm mailing list
> > CompComm at Rock3d.org
> > http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
>
> _______________________________________________
> CompComm mailing list
> CompComm at Rock3d.org
> http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
>