[Compcomm] A ship is likely to sink when it has two Captins :)

[Quinn Storm]

Well I will state again...the biggest reason I haven't posted much here is I 
want to allow a leader to emerge naturally from discussion rather than 
claiming some right to authority due to historical status, which I don't 
truly feel I deserve.  Therefore, at least at status quo, we only have one 
leader (davidr) or no leader (if you only count compcomm), so its more like a 
ship with zero captains goes nowhere...so basically I am saying...we all need 
to decide if we want to work together as a compcomm toward a final product, 
or if our goals are too divergent to actually see that (and if so, what 
should we do? we don't want to rekindle the animosity that obviously still 
burns so strong, we do want to avoid needless duplication of effort and more 
importantly provide a good end user experience that is easy to maintain 
(complete maintenance chain in place))

On Saturday 28 April 2007 12:28:13 verb wrote:
> Especially if those Captins were competing before.....
>
> Don't get me wrong....I like Compiz and Beryl (likewise GNOME and KDE)
> and I don't like to act as an Internet troll :)  but I am really worried
> about the new project.Apart from Community Councils and the like, every
> project must have a Leader, otherwise conflicting ideas will remain
> unresolved longer because nobody has a final word in the community.
>
> Will the new community be able to overcome the challenges and reach the
> point of real unification? I hope so.
>
> Thanks and again please don't get me wrong :) I never wanted to post
> anything "flammable", because I like both projects and ,of course, the
> new project.
>
> Verb
>
> _______________________________________________
> CompComm mailing list
> CompComm at Rock3d.org
> http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm