[Compcomm] A ship is likely to sink when it has two Captins :)

[Sam Spilsbury]

I know this sounds communist and even like I'm some sort of dictator but
deciding a new leader is going to be an awefully hard process. If someone
can tell me who exactely is the leader of Compiz-extra then they can sort of
direct the project and keep everyone on topic. A leader isnt necessarily
going to say "Do this, do that" but just make sure that people aren't
arguing all the time and make sure that people are working on what they said
they are working on. The new leader just has to make sure that this whole
thing isnt a disorganised mess.

On 4/29/07, Stephen Moore <delfick755 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> personally i say new leader....
>
> sry quinn...
>
> On 4/29/07, Sam Spilsbury <smspillaz at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Well basically, everyone at Beryl listens to Quinn Storm, but If no-one
> > wants to lead I guess you can claim some leadership until everyone else
> > comes out instead of everyone being on the same level and arguing about....
> >
> > On 4/29/07, Quinn Storm < livinglatexkali at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Well I will state again...the biggest reason I haven't posted much
> > > here is I
> > > want to allow a leader to emerge naturally from discussion rather than
> > > claiming some right to authority due to historical status, which I
> > > don't
> > > truly feel I deserve.  Therefore, at least at status quo, we only have
> > > one
> > > leader (davidr) or no leader (if you only count compcomm), so its more
> > > like a
> > > ship with zero captains goes nowhere...so basically I am saying...we
> > > all need
> > > to decide if we want to work together as a compcomm toward a final
> > > product,
> > > or if our goals are too divergent to actually see that (and if so,
> > > what
> > > should we do? we don't want to rekindle the animosity that obviously
> > > still
> > > burns so strong, we do want to avoid needless duplication of effort
> > > and more
> > > importantly provide a good end user experience that is easy to
> > > maintain
> > > (complete maintenance chain in place))
> > >
> > > On Saturday 28 April 2007 12:28:13 verb wrote:
> > > > Especially if those Captins were competing before.....
> > > >
> > > > Don't get me wrong....I like Compiz and Beryl (likewise GNOME and
> > > KDE)
> > > > and I don't like to act as an Internet troll :)  but I am really
> > > worried
> > > > about the new project.Apart from Community Councils and the like,
> > > every
> > > > project must have a Leader, otherwise conflicting ideas will remain
> > > > unresolved longer because nobody has a final word in the community.
> > > >
> > > > Will the new community be able to overcome the challenges and reach
> > > the
> > > > point of real unification? I hope so.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks and again please don't get me wrong :) I never wanted to post
> > >
> > > > anything "flammable", because I like both projects and ,of course,
> > > the
> > > > new project.
> > > >
> > > > Verb
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > CompComm mailing list
> > > > CompComm at Rock3d.org
> > > > http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CompComm mailing list
> > > CompComm at Rock3d.org
> > > http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CompComm mailing list
> > CompComm at Rock3d.org
> > http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> CompComm mailing list
> CompComm at Rock3d.org
> http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.RiverGorgeSolutions.net/pipermail/compcomm/attachments/20070429/2f6bafd8/attachment-0002.htm>