[Compcomm] Name poll

[RYX]

Am Montag, den 04.06.2007, 13:22 +0200 schrieb Danny Baumann:
> Hi,
> 
> > > The name poll has started, check it out at ttp://tinyurl.com/3bx9oj
> 
> I want to mention first that I am completely unbiased here ... I do not
> care about the chosen name at all, but leave up the decision to people
> who care about it. But I can't stand this "argumentation" style, sorry.
> 
> > I am not surprised that everyone (i.e. most people) continues ignoring
> > my suggestions -  Coral and the "combo-names"made it into the poll, 
> 
> "Combo-names"? Which ones are you referring to?
Playing stupid is what you like most, right? What do you think "coral"
is? It "evolved" from "coryl" ...

> 
> > I
> > assume once again because some people just lack leader-abilities here
> > and simply pick up everything that is thrown in without spending a
> > second with thinking about style and uniqueness. Of course, who cares if
> > the name is already used for tenth of other things?
> 
> Huh? Can you elaborate a bit more?
No. I am tired of repeating myself and others.

> 
> > Why do you guys want to continue the pseudo-democracy thing you killed
> > your beloved beryl-project with??? Can't you understand that there are
> > people who have some more "sense" for project-management and -identity?
> 
> Who are these people? And why don't they suggest names and explain why
> these names should be chosen as everyone else does?
Everyone but the users. They said a billion times that they don't care
at all - why should people who don't care about something make a
decision about it?

> 
> > I (once again) propose naming it just "beryl 2.0"- because that's what
> > it is ... 
> 
> Huh? (again) ... It's not, and you know that. You just want to bitch
> around a bit here.
I can very well bitch around while telling the truth. Bitching around
doesn't make me automatically wrong ...

> 
> > Chances to get me into the boat finally went to zero with your
> > "great" name poll. Mike said it before and I can only agree: this is all
> > a farce and it becomes more and more stupid ...
> 
> Same question as to Mike before to you: Why do you keep bitching around
> here if everything is "a farce" and is "stupid"? Why don't you try to
> either
> a) be constructive or
> b) just shut up?
Because I am still concerned about what happens to compiz (obviously
much more than most others). The new project is said to be a "combined"
project ... but in fact it is everything from beryl modified to work on
top of compiz-core. So why don't you just call it beryl 2.0 ??? It would
fit best ...

Once again - being constructive does not mean accepting any
bullshit-idea for the "greater good". Yes-sayers are not constructive,
they are just afraid of telling their real opinion ...

And one small question: How can it be constructive to "just shut up" and
watch everything getting worse and worse? That's quite paradox ...

> 
> Sorry for the harsh wording, but I'm extremely annoyed of complaints and
> bitching about people's behaviour, people's code and whatnot without any
> constructive idea or contribution.
Whenever I try to be somehow constructive you start complaining and
bitching about what I say - is that your way of being constructive?

> 
> > (and btw: where the hell is coco a combination of "compiz and beryl" -
> > it initially meant "compiz community" or maybe "composite comunity" ...
> 
> Who said that CoCo is a combination of "compiz and beryl"? It doesn't
> make any sense to me - if anyone said that, it surely doesn't reflect
> the majority opinion (I'm sure you know that, but bitching around is
> fun, isn't it?)
Kristian said it - but of course he is "only a complainer" and doesn't
reflect the majority of yes-sayers around here, right? Even though he is
the only "ex-beryl"-person I can agree with (sometimes) ...

> 
> > Having a bunch of nerdy teenagers select a cool name is like letting a
> > bunch of pigs select an elegant wardrobe for the evening) ...
> 
> Insults FTW?
No, the naked (yet unfriendly) truth :P ... I am not the type of guy who
tries to be polite only to get more people to agree with me.

> 
> > Regards
> > 
> > RYX
> 
> Signing with a pseudonym is commonly seen as impolite - why don't you
> use your real name?
Well - you know what my name is, don't you? Most people call me RYX
anyway. Did I appear like giving a shit about being polite in this mail?

Rico

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Danny
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CompComm mailing list
> CompComm at Rock3d.org
> http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm