[Compcomm] A funny situation

[Franz Rogar]

2007/6/18, Mike Dransfield <mike at blueroot.co.uk>:
> Franz Rogar wrote:
> > Note: I've kept the whole post 'cause this is the general answer that
> > host them all ;)
> >
> > That's why Beryl had packagers and official repos so newbies only need
> > to add the repo and install :)
> >
> >
> Beryl only needed to provide packagers and repos
> because it was unofficial and not included by default.
>
> Compiz users normally just need to install, there is no
> need to add a 3rd party repo.
>

You still don't get it, right? Beryl was OFFICIAL. Official Beryl, a
fork, but an OFFICIAL project. Same as other forks are "official"
meanwhile it's core developers are in.

Maybe you don't like to hear that Beryl was official. Also, I want
remember you that Compiz wasn't also "included by default" on any
distro. And if Feisty took it as by default, there's Sabayon who did
just the same but for Beryl.

Now, the only difference is that Compiz will stay as only-kernel (and
avoid the beryl one) but, can you say just exactly the same for
CompComm, kiba-doc, screenlets...?

Also, I've never said what should be hosted on repos but you thought I
was refering ONLY to core, which, as I've pointed you, it's not
correct at all.

-- 
Thanks in anyway,
        Franz Rogar