[Compcomm] Our goals?

[Ketil Wendelbo Aanensen]

On 6/19/07, Quinn Storm <livinglatexkali at gmail.com> wrote:
> I haven't read to the end of the thread yet, but what about this, to perhaps
> make everyone happy --
>
> Opencompositing.org - forums, links, hosting(perhaps, depending on project)
> for many compositing-related projects, perhaps including at least part of
> what is tentatively called compiz fusion (though the forums may actually be
> at compiz.org to make the link-merge work)
>
> compiz.org - forums at least for the compiz community, have discussions about
> C-F here, perhaps host part of it here (we already have a nice working git on
> OCO, but it'd be simple to have DNS redirect so naming doesn't matter), have
> this be the official place for C-F even though at least part of it is under
> the larger OCO project umbrella
>
> Therefore, C-F is a compiz enhancement project while OCO is a generalized Free
> Software compositing hub
>
> How does this sound?  There is no need to be either-or here, both are
> legitimate goals, just *different* ones
>
> --Quinn (yes its me, honest)


Good to see you're still with us :)

I think this sounds great. Noone is denying anyone the right to have
oc.org as their big project (it's a free world), but Compiz Fusion
(can't you just call it that?) should be directly connected to
compiz.org,
DNS-ing it all would be great, and have two parties with a
non-secteric attitude.

- Ketil

PS: Oc.org is, by the way, a very poor "acronym", it's an existing
site with religious content. See the cute parallel to the compiz/beryl
camps? :) Their top news post is "Look Up, Look Inward, and Look
Forward". Maybe we should pick up that?