[Compcomm] CompComm has a real name!

[RYX]

Am Mittwoch, den 20.06.2007, 21:16 -0400 schrieb nesl247:
> Jeff, you must have missed my statement.
> 
> > No where did I say the ml shouldn't be used for major decisions. But a
> > decision to have an artwork contest.. That's retarded.
> 
> Meaning, I think MAJOR decisions should be discussed on the ml. 
Official stuff like contests, polls and announcements definetly should
be seen as MAJOR decisions. Even if it is "only" an artwork contest.
Besides that I agree.

> Not
> every discussion warrants a ml post.
Like this one? :) ...

> 
> On 6/20/07, Jeffrey Laramie <imnotpc at rock3d.org> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 June 2007 18:51, nesl247 wrote:
> > > No where did I say the ml shouldn't be used for major decisions. But a
> > > decision to have an artwork contest.. That's retarded.
> > >
> > > And a good chunk of the devs use irc: racarr, kristianly, onestone,
> > > roico, marex, etc etc.
> > >
> > > And don't you even dare repeat that "you know - there are people who
> > > actually have a real life and don't have time to monitor an
> > > irc-channel all day." crap. If you have time to read the ML, you have
> > > time to be on IRC.
> >
> > Easy Alex, this isn't appropriate. You know that I'm not against discussing
> > things on IRC, but it isn't always convenient, and important discussions may
> > occur while others are at work/school/sleep and unable to participate. Any
> > decisions that affect (community) people outside the discussion should occur
> > on a medium where opinions/votes can be registered over a period of time,
> > i.e. ML, forum, obby. That doesn't mean they can be discussed/argued forever.
> > I think any future votes or discussion should have a time limit decided prior
> > to starting the discussion.
> >
> > Jeff
> > _______________________________________________
> > CompComm mailing list
> > CompComm at Rock3d.org
> > http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
> >
> 
>