[Compcomm] Forum Decision

Mike Dransfield mike at blueroot.co.uk
Fri May 11 11:23:07 EDT 2007


Danny Baumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>   
>>> Bah, you know what I mean ;-)
>>> Rephrased: Cedric now also uses git.opencompositing.org, so you and RYX
>>> are the only active developers not using it.
>>> Better?
>>>   
>>>       
>> Not really, the 'everyone else is doing it so you should too' argument
>> never really held any weight for me anyway.
>>     
>
> I never said that.
>   

No, but thats the argument you are using.

Otherwise what does that mean?

>   
>> I don't think I have ever disagreed with that, the only thing
>> matching that description is here and I compiled it.
>>
>> http://www.anykeysoftware.co.uk/compiz/plugins/extra-plugins-0.5.0.2.tar.gz
>>
>> The only thing which I do not agree with is changing the name
>> of that to something 'neutral' and creating an entire forum around
>> it, deleting everything in the process.  THEN, repeating every 6
>> months along with the mood of the majority.  I want to build stability
>> and that cannot happen by changing everything all the time.
>>     
>
> That wasn't exactly the point of discussion here.
>   

Check original post and subject ;)

We were going off topic, I was trying to bring it slightly more
on topic.  It seems like you do not have any real objections other
than I do not host in a public git repo, that is not the subject
of discussion either, neither is packaging or anything else you
have mentioned.

I do not really understand why not hosting in a public git repo
is such an issue, I would not be handing out write permissions
like candy anyway.  If you really want to help me and send a
patch I can apply it for you, use the -git archive to work from.

>> This has nothing to do with everyone using the same git repo, the
>> compiz-extra tarball will always comprise of plugins taken from
>> different locations and it should be built to accommodate that.
>>     
>
> So you know EXACTLY the revision of the source files you packaged? You
> have an EXACT repo tag? All releases of serious software I am aware of
> have exactly that.
>   

I do not really consider the python plugin to be serious yet,
once it is I am sure I will know things like that.  But at the
moment I have better things to do and nobody cares anyway.

If someone really wanted to know which git tag was with each
release then they could find out.  At the moment I am more
interested in expanding the API.

> Regards,
>
> Danny
>
> _______________________________________________
> CompComm mailing list
> CompComm at Rock3d.org
> http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
>   




More information about the CompComm mailing list