[Compcomm] Release & repo policy

[Danny Baumann]

Hi,

> >> Either way it is very possible to have one source release which
> >> comprises of many sources from many release sources and
> >> source releases.  Hows that?
> >>     
> >
> > That's bullshit.
> >   
> 
> How?
> 
> I can prove to you its possible, but Id rather not since it seems
> to upset you when I distribute things that I didn't write.

It's possible to do what your sentence says, but your sentence still is
bullshit. Looks like you want to show everyone you are able to form
overly complicated sentences.

> >>> Ok, again:
> >>> - I talked about your tarball and the lack of reproducibility of its
> >>>       
> >> source
> >>     
> >>> origin / revision.
> >>> - You responded with statements about the Python plugin.
> >>>
> >>> You should ask yourself how those are related and not me.
> >>>
> >>>       
> >> I was asking how I was being contradictive.  Maybe you didn't
> >> mean contradiction?
> >>     
> >
> > Maybe, English is not my mother tongue. I meant the English translation of
> > "Widerspruch" - maybe one of the Germans can jump in here.
> >   
> 
> My friend google says it means contradiction, but things
> have to be related before they can contradict each other so
> two unrelated statements cannot be contradictions.
> 
> I think I have answered your question if you meant that I
> was dodging the question.

Not the arguments themselves contradict, but there is a contradiction in
your argumentation.

> >> I told you I had a list of all the plugins and their svn revision
> >> where applicable.
> >>     
> >
> > WHERE IS THIS LIST?
> >   
> 
> GONE!
> 
> Waiting for inbuilt versioning

Ok, so noone is able to support this package properly - not even the
original authors as there obviously isn't any track of your changes to
it. That was the information I was interested in. Why did you insist
there is version information in the first place?

Anyway, I don't even know why I keep answering to you. You don't seem to
be interested in any serious discussion. You either
- apply guerilla tactics to your argumentation trying to make a fool of
the other person (see your stupid sentence above)
- or do countless argumentation U-turns in the hope noone notices it (as
in "Package A has no proper version management - I think Plugin B does
not need version management because it's still new."

I have better uses for my time than wasting it in such 'discussions'.
Initially I hoped it's possible to rationally discuss with you, but I
see that's not the case.

EOD from my side.

Regards,

Danny