[Compcomm] Forum Decision
Stephen Moore
delfick755 at gmail.com
Sun May 13 12:17:53 EDT 2007
On 5/14/07, Guillaume Seguin <guillaume at segu.in> wrote:
>
> 2007/5/13, Mike Dransfield <mike at blueroot.co.uk>:
> > Stephen Moore wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/13/07, *Vasek Potocek* <vasek.potocek at post.cz
> > > <mailto:vasek.potocek at post.cz>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Jeffrey Laramie napsal:
> > > > On Saturday 12 May 2007 18:52, Mike Dransfield wrote:
> > > >> Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
> > > >>> On Thursday 10 May 2007 19:35, Franz Rogar wrote:
> > > >>>> 2007/5/11, RYX < ryx at ryxperience.com
> > > <mailto:ryx at ryxperience.com>>:
> > > >>>>> What happens to compiz.org <http://compiz.org>? Is it now
> > > deprecated? I don't understand
> > > >>>>> how exactly the new forum is meant to integrate with the
> > > compiz-website
> > > >>>>> - if it is at all. If it isn't - what do compiz users do if
> > > they want
> > > >>>>> support? Go to the opencompositing-forums? That is a highly
> > > >>>>> unprofessional presentation of compiz and its greatness.
> > > >>>> I'm 100% with you. Just why not do a redirection from
> > > forum.compiz.org <http://forum.compiz.org>
> > > >>>> to opencompositing.org <http://opencompositing.org>? Just an
> > > idea (not very elegant but... a
> > > >>>> solution).
> > > >>> This should work fine.
> > > >> Would this involve deleting all the posts on the current forum?
> > > >
> > > > No, I think the current compiz forum should be "frozen" as a RO
> > > subforum of
> > > > the opencompositing.org <http://opencompositing.org> forum. As I
> > > said earlier, it's possible to import the
> > > > current forums using vB, but I think a RO link as a subforum
> > > gives us nearly
> > > > the same benefit without the effort of: import-compiz +
> > > import-beryl +
> > > > convert vB to phpbb2. If Rico and Arturo port the current compiz
> > > forum theme
> > > > to the combined forum, we can change the link on compiz.org
> > > <http://compiz.org> and the combined
> > > > forum will become part of the compiz site.
> > > >
> > > > Jeff
> > >
> > > What about topics not influenced by the change, e.g., Screenlets
> > > and maybe "Ideas / Feature requests"? There are some
> > > open discussions there.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > what if the really active ones are ported to the new forums and then
> > > give a month or so when people can nominate particular threads to be
> > > ported to new forums, after which no new threads can be ported....
> > >
> > > seeing as it's only a small forum (especially when compared to the old
> > > beryl forums, that shouldn't be too hard??)
> >
> > Here is a question for you.
> >
> > We only have a finite number of web developers.
> >
> > Would you prefer that they spent the next 3 months working on..
> >
> > a) Creating yet another compiz site (forum, wiki, blog, migrating
> > threads etc etc)?
>
> This wouldn't take 3 months. Endless discussions might take that long,
> doing things is much faster.
>
> > OR
> > b) Creating your flash based settings tool with spinning minicube?
> >
i say both :D
(nah, just kidding, option b FTW :D)
> The choice is yours. I do not mind either way, although option A does
> seem
> > like a bit of a waste of time in the cold light of day doesn't it?
> >
>
> B doesn't sound really much more useful either way..
yes it does :D
_______________________________________________
> CompComm mailing list
> CompComm at Rock3d.org
> http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.RiverGorgeSolutions.net/pipermail/compcomm/attachments/20070514/5995f24f/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the CompComm
mailing list